Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0i ecoFLEX | 206 L | 16 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 206x | -272L |
1.0i | 206 L | 16 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 206x | -272L |
Vehicle | 1.0i ecoFLEX |
---|---|
Trunk space | 206 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -272L |
Vehicle | 1.0i |
Trunk space | 206 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -272L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1100 SL90 | 759 L | 33 L to 1 s | 21.1x | 655x | +281L |
1256 | 759 L | - | 21.1x | 604x | +281L |
1600 | 759 L | 47 L to 1 s | 14.1x | 475x | +281L |
2300 | 759 L | - | - | 333x | +281L |
1800 | 759 L | - | 14.1x | 431x | +281L |
Vehicle | 1100 SL90 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 759 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 21.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 655x |
Difference with world average | +281L |
Vehicle | 1256 |
Trunk space | 759 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 21.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 604x |
Difference with world average | +281L |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Trunk space | 759 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 475x |
Difference with world average | +281L |
Vehicle | 2300 |
Trunk space | 759 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 333x |
Difference with world average | +281L |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Trunk space | 759 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 431x |
Difference with world average | +281L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600 | 526 L | - | 9.6x | 329x | +48L |
1.2 | 526 L | - | 14.6x | 454x | +48L |
1100 | 526 L | - | - | 498x | +48L |
Vehicle | 1600 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 526 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 329x |
Difference with world average | +48L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 526 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 454x |
Difference with world average | +48L |
Vehicle | 1100 |
Trunk space | 526 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 498x |
Difference with world average | +48L |