Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI | 770 L | - | 11.7x | 388x | +292L |
2.0 TDI | 563 L | 76 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 286x | +85L |
2.0 BiTDI | 563 L | 91 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 286x | +85L |
1.5 TSI | 563 L | 65 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 376x | +85L |
1.5 TSI ACT | 563 L | 66 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 376x | +85L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 770 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 388x |
Difference with world average | +292L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 563 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | +85L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BiTDI |
Trunk space | 563 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | +85L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI |
Trunk space | 563 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 376x |
Difference with world average | +85L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI ACT |
Trunk space | 563 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 376x |
Difference with world average | +85L |