Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 | 1141 L | - | 16.2x | 317x | +663L |
2.0 TFSI | 1141 L | - | 16.2x | 575x | +663L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1141 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 317x |
Difference with world average | +663L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TFSI |
Trunk space | 1141 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 575x |
Difference with world average | +663L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 | 583 L | - | 8.3x | 162x | +105L |
2.0 | 583 L | - | 8.3x | 294x | +105L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 583 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | +105L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 583 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 294x |
Difference with world average | +105L |