Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI | 918 L | 78 L to 1 s | 15.3x | 767x | +440L |
1.6 TDI | 918 L | 74 L to 1 s | 15.3x | 574x | +440L |
2.0 TDI | 918 L | 108 L to 1 s | 15.3x | 466x | +440L |
1.6 | 918 L | 71 L to 1 s | - | 576x | +440L |
2.0 | 918 L | 70 L to 1 s | 70.6x | 463x | +440L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 918 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 767x |
Difference with world average | +440L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 918 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 574x |
Difference with world average | +440L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 918 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 466x |
Difference with world average | +440L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 918 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 576x |
Difference with world average | +440L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 918 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 70.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 463x |
Difference with world average | +440L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI | 1650 L | 136 L to 1 s | 27.5x | 1378x | +1172L |
1.6 TDI | 1650 L | 138 L to 1 s | 27.5x | 1033x | +1172L |
2.0 TDI | 1650 L | 190 L to 1 s | 27.5x | 838x | +1172L |
1.6 | 1650 L | 121 L to 1 s | - | 1034x | +1172L |
2.0 | 1650 L | 117 L to 1 s | 126.9x | 832x | +1172L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1650 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 136 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 27.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 1378x |
Difference with world average | +1172L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 1650 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 138 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 27.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 1033x |
Difference with world average | +1172L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 1650 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 190 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 27.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 838x |
Difference with world average | +1172L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 1650 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 121 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 1034x |
Difference with world average | +1172L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 1650 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 117 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 126.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 832x |
Difference with world average | +1172L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 530 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 332x | +52L |
1.9 TDI | 530 L | 41 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 280x | +52L |
2.0 TDI | 530 L | 50 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 269x | +52L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 332x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 280x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 560 L | 35 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 403x | +82L |
1.9 TDI | 560 L | 44 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 295x | +82L |
2.0 ecoFuel | 560 L | 43 L to 1 s | 43.1x | 282x | +82L |
1.6 | 560 L | 43 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 351x | +82L |
1.4 16V | 560 L | 33 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 403x | +82L |
2.0 SDI | 560 L | 29 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 285x | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 403x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 295x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 2.0 ecoFuel |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 43.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 282x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 351x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 403x |
Difference with world average | +82L |
Vehicle | 2.0 SDI |
Trunk space | 560 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | +82L |