Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TSI | 399 L | - | 8x | 286x | -79L |
GLI 2.0 TSI | 399 L | - | 8x | 201x | -79L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 399 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | -79L |
Vehicle | GLI 2.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 399 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -79L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI | 510 L | 50 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 426x | +32L |
1.4 TSI | 510 L | 62 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 366x | +32L |
2.0 TDI | 510 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 259x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 426x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 366x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i TSI | 527 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 379x | +49L |
1.6i 16V | 527 L | 45 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 330x | +49L |
1.2 | 510 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 426x | +32L |
1.6 | 510 L | 46 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 319x | +32L |
2.0 TDI | 510 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.3x | 259x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.4i TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 379x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 426x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 319x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TSI | 527 L | 65 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 379x | +49L |
1.6 FSI | 527 L | 50 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 330x | +49L |
1.6 i | 527 L | 45 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 330x | +49L |
1.9 TDI PDE | 527 L | 47 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 278x | +49L |
2.0 FSI | 527 L | 61 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 266x | +49L |
2.0 TFSI | 527 L | - | 9.6x | 266x | +49L |
2.5i | 527 L | 61 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 213x | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 379x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.6 FSI |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI PDE |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 278x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 2.0 FSI |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TFSI |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 TDI | 455 L | 37 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 240x | -23L |
2.3 VR5 20V | 455 L | 56 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 196x | -23L |
1.8T 20V | 455 L | 54 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 255x | -23L |
2.0 | 455 L | 43 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 229x | -23L |
1.6 | 455 L | 41 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 285x | -23L |
1.4 16V | 455 L | 32 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 327x | -23L |
1.6 16V | 455 L | 43 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 285x | -23L |
1.8 i T | 455 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 255x | -23L |
2.3 VR5 | 455 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 196x | -23L |
2.8 VR6 | 460 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 165x | -18L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 2.3 VR5 20V |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.8T 20V |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 255x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 327x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i T |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 255x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 2.3 VR5 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 2.8 VR6 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i T 20V | 460 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 258x | -18L |
2.0 | 1470 L | 140 L to 1 s | 26.7x | 741x | +992L |
1.9 TDI | 460 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 243x | -18L |
2.3 VR5 | 460 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 198x | -18L |
Vehicle | 1.8i T 20V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 1470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 140 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 26.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 741x |
Difference with world average | +992L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.3 VR5 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 198x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 500 L | 42 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 281x | +22L |
2.0 | 500 L | 51 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 252x | +22L |
2.8 VR6 | 500 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 179x | +22L |
1.6 | 500 L | 45 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 313x | +22L |
1.9 D | 500 L | 29 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 264x | +22L |
1.9 TDI | 500 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 264x | +22L |
1.9 SDI | 885 L | 51 L to 1 s | 16.1x | 467x | +407L |
1.9 TD | 500 L | 34 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 264x | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 281x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.8 VR6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 313x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SDI |
Trunk space | 885 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 467x |
Difference with world average | +407L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i | 660 L | 58 L to 1 s | 12x | 371x | +182L |
1.6 | 660 L | 48 L to 1 s | 12x | 414x | +182L |
1.3 i | 600 L | 37 L to 1 s | 10.9x | 472x | +122L |
1.8 i 16V | 660 L | 75 L to 1 s | 12x | 371x | +182L |
1.8 i Syncro | 485 L | 44 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 272x | +7L |
1.8 i | 660 L | 65 L to 1 s | 12x | 371x | +182L |
2.0 i 16V | 660 L | 75 L to 1 s | 12x | 333x | +182L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 660 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 371x |
Difference with world average | +182L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 660 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 414x |
Difference with world average | +182L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 472x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 660 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 371x |
Difference with world average | +182L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i Syncro |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 272x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Trunk space | 660 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 371x |
Difference with world average | +182L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 660 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 333x |
Difference with world average | +182L |