Volkswagen Lupo Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Volkswagen Lupo trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 136 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 1.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 34 L
    • Max trunk load: 55 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 16V : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.0 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI 3L : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i FSI 16V : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i 16V : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDI : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V GTI : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 1.7 SDI : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 16V : 0.76 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.0 : 0.86 L/km-h (0.53 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TDI : 0.79 L/km-h (0.49 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TDI 3L : 0.79 L/km-h (0.49 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i : 0.81 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i FSI 16V : 0.93 L/km-h (0.58 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i 16V : 0.69 L/km-h (0.43 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDI : 0.76 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 16V GTI : 0.63 L/km-h (0.39 L/mph)
  • 1.7 SDI : 0.83 L/km-h (0.52 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 TDI 3L : 43.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 i : 21x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 i FSI 16V : 37.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i 16V GTI : 18.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 16V 130 L 11 L to 1 s 3.8x 94x -348L
    1.0 130 L 8 L to 1 s 3.8x 130x -348L
    1.2 TDI 130 L 10 L to 1 s 3.8x 109x -348L
    1.2 TDI 3L 130 L 10 L to 1 s 3.8x 109x -348L
    1.4 i 130 L 10 L to 1 s 3.8x 94x -348L
    1.4 i FSI 16V 185 L 17 L to 1 s 5.4x 133x -293L
    1.4 i 16V 130 L 14 L to 1 s 3.8x 94x -348L
    1.4 TDI 130 L 11 L to 1 s 3.8x 91x -348L
    1.6 i 16V GTI 130 L 17 L to 1 s 3.8x 81x -348L
    1.7 SDI 130 L 9 L to 1 s 3.8x 76x -348L
    Vehicle 1.4 16V
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 8 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 109x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI 3L
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 109x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.4 i
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.4 i FSI 16V
    Trunk space 185 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 17 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 133x
    Difference with world average -293L
    Vehicle 1.4 i 16V
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDI
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 91x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V GTI
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 17 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 81x
    Difference with world average -348L
    Vehicle 1.7 SDI
    Trunk space 130 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 9 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 76x
    Difference with world average -348L