Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 BlueTDI | 532 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 270x | +54L |
2.0 TDI | 532 L | 67 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 270x | +54L |
1.4 TSI | 532 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 383x | +54L |
2.0 TSI | 532 L | 74 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 268x | +54L |
3.6 V6 FSI | 532 L | 102 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 148x | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueTDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 383x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 FSI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TSI | 532 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 296x | +54L |
2.0 TSI | 532 L | 72 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 268x | +54L |
2.0 TDI | 532 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 270x | +54L |
3.6 V6 FSI | 532 L | 100 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 149x | +54L |
2.0 | 532 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 270x | +54L |
Vehicle | 1.8 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 296x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 FSI |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | +54L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 532 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +54L |