Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TSI | 300 L | 32 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 215x | -178L |
2.0 TSI | 300 L | 41 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 151x | -178L |
2.0 TDI | 300 L | 35 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 152x | -178L |
2.0 TDI SCR | 955 L | 111 L to 1 s | 13.6x | 485x | +477L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI SCR |
Trunk space | 955 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 111 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 485x |
Difference with world average | +477L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TSI | 300 L | 32 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 216x | -178L |
2.0 TDI | 885 L | 97 L to 1 s | 12.6x | 450x | +407L |
2.0 TSI | 300 L | 38 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 151x | -178L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 885 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 97 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 450x |
Difference with world average | +407L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8i VR6 24V | 256 L | 27 L to 1 s | 3.7x | 92x | -222L |
2.8i VR6 24V Syncro | 256 L | 26 L to 1 s | 3.7x | 92x | -222L |
2.0i | 256 L | 18 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 129x | -222L |
2.8i VR6 GL | 256 L | 23 L to 1 s | 3.4x | 92x | -222L |
1.9 TDI | 256 L | 14 L to 1 s | 3.4x | 135x | -222L |
1.8 i T 20V | 256 L | 22 L to 1 s | 3.4x | 144x | -222L |
1.9 TDI Syncro | 256 L | 19 L to 1 s | 3.7x | 135x | -222L |
2.8 i VR6 Syncro | 256 L | 20 L to 1 s | 3.4x | 92x | -222L |
Vehicle | 2.8i VR6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 92x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 2.8i VR6 24V Syncro |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 92x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 2.8i VR6 GL |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 92x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i T 20V |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI Syncro |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | -222L |
Vehicle | 2.8 i VR6 Syncro |
Trunk space | 256 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 92x |
Difference with world average | -222L |