Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI | 834 L | 78 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 697x | +356L |
1.8 TSI | 834 L | 106 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 464x | +356L |
1.4 TSI | 834 L | 98 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 598x | +356L |
2.0 TDI | 834 L | 77 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 424x | +356L |
1.6 TDI | 834 L | 74 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 522x | +356L |
1.0 TSI | 834 L | 78 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 835x | +356L |
1.5 TSI ACT | 834 L | 98 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 557x | +356L |
2.0 TDI SCR | 834 L | 107 L to 1 s | 14.4x | 424x | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 697x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.8 TSI |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 106 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 464x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 598x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 424x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 522x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.0 TSI |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 835x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI ACT |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 557x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI SCR |
Trunk space | 834 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 424x |
Difference with world average | +356L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGI 1.4 TSI | 592 L | 59 L to 1 s | 53.8x | 426x | +114L |
1.4 TSI | 121 L | 13 L to 1 s | 2x | 87x | -357L |
2.0 TDI | 695 L | 71 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 353x | +217L |
Vehicle | TGI 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 592 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 53.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 426x |
Difference with world average | +114L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 121 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | -357L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 353x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 TSI | 695 L | 62 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 581x | +217L |
2.0 TDI | 695 L | 82 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 353x | +217L |
1.6 TDI | 695 L | 57 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 435x | +217L |
TGI 1.4 TSI | 592 L | 61 L to 1 s | 53.8x | 426x | +114L |
1.4 TSI | 695 L | 77 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 500x | +217L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 581x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 353x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | TGI 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 592 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 53.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 426x |
Difference with world average | +114L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 500x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i | 667 L | 54 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 418x | +189L |
1.9 TDI | 667 L | 47 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 352x | +189L |
2.0 TDI | 649 L | 64 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 330x | +171L |
1.4 TSI | 667 L | 82 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 480x | +189L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 418x |
Difference with world average | +189L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | +189L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 649 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +171L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 480x |
Difference with world average | +189L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDI | 649 L | 64 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 330x | +171L |
1.9 TDI | 662 L | 52 L to 1 s | 11x | 349x | +184L |
1.6 FSI | 667 L | 59 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 417x | +189L |
1.6 i | 667 L | 54 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 418x | +189L |
2.0 FSI | 667 L | 67 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 336x | +189L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 649 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +171L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 662 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +184L |
Vehicle | 1.6 FSI |
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 417x |
Difference with world average | +189L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 418x |
Difference with world average | +189L |
Vehicle | 2.0 FSI |
Trunk space | 667 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 336x |
Difference with world average | +189L |