Volvo S60 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Volvo S60 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 390 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.9 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 78 L
    • Max trunk load: 122 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.3 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Polestar 2.0 T8 : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T6 Twin Engine : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Polestar 2.0 T8 : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T6 Twin Engine : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Polestar 2.0 T8 : 229.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T8 Twin Engine : 229.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T6 Twin Engine : 229.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Polestar 2.0 T8 390 L 93 L to 1 s 6.5x 198x -88L
    2.0 T8 Twin Engine 390 L 89 L to 1 s 6.5x 198x -88L
    2.0 T6 Twin Engine 390 L 80 L to 1 s 6.5x 198x -88L
    Vehicle Polestar 2.0 T8
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 93 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 198x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 2.0 T8 Twin Engine
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 198x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle 2.0 T6 Twin Engine
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 80 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 198x
    Difference with world average -88L

    Quick notes on Volvo S60 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
      • Max trunk load: 99 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5 T5 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5 T5 : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.85 L/km-h (1.15 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.5 T5 : 44.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 82.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 82.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5 T5 380 L 57 L to 1 s 5.6x 152x -98L
    2.0 D4 380 L 52 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    2.4 D5 380 L 45 L to 1 s 5.6x 158x -98L
    2.0 D3 380 L 44 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 152x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 158x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L

    Quick notes on Volvo S60 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
      • Max trunk load: 97 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T6 : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T2 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D5 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T3 : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T6 : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T2 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T3 : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T3 : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T4 : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D2 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.85 L/km-h (1.15 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D5 : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 1.6 D2 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T6 : 55.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T2 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T3 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T3 : 67.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T4 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D2 : 90.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 88.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D5 : 84.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 D2 : 88.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 88.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T3 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 59.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 64.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 63.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T6 380 L 68 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    1.5 T2 380 L 39 L to 1 s 5.6x 254x -98L
    1.5 T3 380 L 46 L to 1 s 5.6x 254x -98L
    2.0 T3 380 L 46 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    2.0 T4 380 L 56 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    2.0 D2 380 L 35 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    2.0 D3 380 L 39 L to 1 s 5.6x 192x -98L
    2.0 D5 380 L 62 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    1.6 D2 380 L 37 L to 1 s 5.6x 244x -98L
    2.0 D4 380 L 44 L to 1 s 5.6x 192x -98L
    1.6 T3 380 L 43 L to 1 s 5.6x 238x -98L
    1.6 T4 380 L 48 L to 1 s 5.6x 238x -98L
    2.4 D5 380 L 53 L to 1 s 5.6x 158x -98L
    3.0 T6 380 L 68 L to 1 s 5.6x 129x -98L
    2.0 T5 380 L 63 L to 1 s 5.6x 193x -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T6
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.5 T2
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 254x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 254x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 T3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 158x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 193x
    Difference with world average -98L

    Quick notes on Volvo S60 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 D5 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Drive : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T3 : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4F : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 D5 : 80.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 60.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 70.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T5 : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Drive : 88.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T3 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 59.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4F : 55.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 D5 380 L 54 L to 1 s 5.6x 158x -98L
    2.4 D5 AWD 380 L 53 L to 1 s 5.6x 158x -98L
    2.0 D3 380 L 44 L to 1 s 5.6x 192x -98L
    3.0 T5 380 L 61 L to 1 s 5.6x 129x -98L
    2.0 T 380 L 52 L to 1 s 5.6x 190x -98L
    1.6 Drive 380 L 37 L to 1 s 5.6x 244x -98L
    1.6 T3 380 L 44 L to 1 s 5.6x 238x -98L
    1.6 T4 380 L 48 L to 1 s 5.6x 238x -98L
    1.6 T4F 380 L 48 L to 1 s 5.6x 238x -98L
    2.0 T5 380 L 55 L to 1 s 5.6x 190x -98L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 158x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5 AWD
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 158x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 3.0 T5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 Drive
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 T3
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4F
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average -98L

    Quick notes on Volvo S60 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 424 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 84.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 91 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.4 20V : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 2.4i 20V T5 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4i 20V : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 T : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.5i 20V R : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • T5 2.3 20V : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i T : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i 20V AWD : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 2.4 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D : 1.84 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 2.4 20V : 1.84 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 2.4i 20V T5 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.4i 20V : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.4 T : 1.84 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 2.5i 20V R : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • T5 2.3 20V : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i T : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i 20V AWD : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.4 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T : 46.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4i 20V : 47.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 T : 46.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5i 20V R : 40.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 65.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 : 39.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T 424 L 50 L to 1 s 6.1x 214x -54L
    2.4 D 424 L 54 L to 1 s 6.1x 177x -54L
    2.4 20V 424 L 59 L to 1 s 6.1x 168x -54L
    2.4i 20V T5 424 L 68 L to 1 s 6.1x 177x -54L
    2.4i 20V 424 L 51 L to 1 s 6.1x 174x -54L
    2.4 T 424 L 59 L to 1 s 6.1x 174x -54L
    2.5i 20V R 424 L 79 L to 1 s 6.1x 168x -54L
    T5 2.3 20V 424 L 65 L to 1 s 6.1x 183x -54L
    2.0 i T 424 L 50 L to 1 s 6.1x 214x -54L
    2.4 D5 424 L 47 L to 1 s 6.1x 177x -54L
    2.5 i 20V AWD 424 L 61 L to 1 s 6.1x 168x -54L
    2.4 424 L 55 L to 1 s 6.1x 174x -54L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4 20V
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 168x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4i 20V T5
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4i 20V
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4 T
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.5i 20V R
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 168x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle T5 2.3 20V
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V AWD
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 168x
    Difference with world average -54L
    Vehicle 2.4
    Trunk space 424 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -54L