Volvo S80 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
    • Max trunk load: 99 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 D2 : 4.2 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 D2 : 2.59 L/km-h (1.61 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 D2 : 106.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 96x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 67.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 106.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 81.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 77.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 48.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 D2 480 L 39 L to 1 s 6.9x 308x +2L
    2.0 D3 480 L 48 L to 1 s 6.9x 242x +2L
    1.6 T4 480 L 55 L to 1 s 6.9x 301x +2L
    2.0 D4 480 L 60 L to 1 s 6.9x 244x +2L
    2.4 D5 480 L 65 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    2.0 T5 480 L 77 L to 1 s 6.9x 244x +2L
    3.0 T6 480 L 79 L to 1 s 6.9x 163x +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 308x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
      • Max trunk load: 98 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 D3 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Drive : 4.2 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 3.2 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4F : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 3.2 AWD : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 AWD : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 D3 : 85.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Drive : 106.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 78.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 75x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 72.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 : 53.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4F : 69.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 AWD : 51.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 AWD : 48.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 D3 480 L 52 L to 1 s 6.9x 242x +2L
    1.6 Drive 480 L 44 L to 1 s 6.9x 308x +2L
    2.4 D5 480 L 65 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    2.4 D5 AWD 480 L 65 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    1.6 T4 480 L 59 L to 1 s 6.9x 301x +2L
    3.2 480 L 64 L to 1 s 6.9x 150x +2L
    2.0 T5 480 L 68 L to 1 s 6.9x 240x +2L
    1.6 T4F 480 L 59 L to 1 s 6.9x 301x +2L
    3.2 AWD 480 L 62 L to 1 s 6.9x 150x +2L
    3.0 T6 AWD 480 L 75 L to 1 s 6.9x 163x +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 Drive
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 308x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.2
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4F
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.2 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5 T : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0F : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 D DRIVE : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 AWD : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5 T : 2.29 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 2.0F : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.5 T : 55.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0F : 57.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 D DRIVE : 98x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D : 84.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 AWD : 42.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D : 72.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 71.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 AWD : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5 T 480 L 70 L to 1 s 6.9x 190x +2L
    2.0F 480 L 46 L to 1 s 6.9x 240x +2L
    1.6 D DRIVE 480 L 39 L to 1 s 6.9x 308x +2L
    2.0 D 480 L 46 L to 1 s 6.9x 240x +2L
    3.0 T6 AWD 480 L 73 L to 1 s 6.9x 163x +2L
    2.4 D 480 L 53 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    2.4 D5 480 L 59 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    2.4 D5 AWD 480 L 59 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    Vehicle 2.5 T
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 70 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0F
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6 D DRIVE
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 308x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
      • Max trunk load: 96 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5 i T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.5 D5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.5FT : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 3.2 i : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 4.4 i V8 : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 4.4 i V8 AWD : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5 i T : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 2.5 D5 : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D : 2.29 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 2.5FT : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 3.2 i : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 4.4 i V8 : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • 4.4 i V8 AWD : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.5 i T : 52.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 D5 : 75x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D : 76.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5FT : 52.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 i : 49x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.4 i V8 : 40.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.4 i V8 AWD : 40.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5 i T 480 L 66 L to 1 s 6.9x 190x +2L
    2.5 D5 480 L 59 L to 1 s 6.9x 200x +2L
    2.4 D 480 L 53 L to 1 s 6.9x - +2L
    2.5FT 480 L 66 L to 1 s 6.9x 190x +2L
    3.2 i 480 L 63 L to 1 s 6.9x 150x +2L
    4.4 i V8 480 L 77 L to 1 s 6.9x 109x +2L
    4.4 i V8 AWD 480 L 77 L to 1 s 6.9x 109x +2L
    Vehicle 2.5 i T
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.5 D5
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.5FT
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 3.2 i
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 4.4 i V8
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 109x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 4.4 i V8 AWD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 109x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 460 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92 L
      • Max trunk load: 114 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 i 20V : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.9 i 24V Turbo : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 i 20V : 2.19 L/km-h (1.36 L/mph)
  • 2.9 i 24V Turbo : 1.96 L/km-h (1.22 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 i 20V : 51.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 i 20V 460 L 53 L to 1 s 6.6x 189x -18L
    2.9 i 24V Turbo 460 L 59 L to 1 s 5.8x - -18L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 20V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.9 i 24V Turbo
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -18L

    Quick notes on Volvo S80 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 445 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89 L
      • Max trunk load: 92 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 i T : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 20V Turbo : 1.9 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 20V : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i 20V : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 2.4 TDi : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.9 24V : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i 20V : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i T : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.8 24V T6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.9 i 24V : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 i T : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 2.0 20V Turbo : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 2.4 20V : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i 20V : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 2.4 TDi : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 2.9 24V : 1.87 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i 20V : 1.87 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i T : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 2.5 TDI : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.8 24V T6 : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 2.9 i 24V : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 20V : 51.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.9 24V : 45.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8 24V T6 : 35.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 i T 460 L 53 L to 1 s 5.8x 232x -18L
    2.0 20V Turbo 440 L 62 L to 1 s 5.5x 222x -38L
    2.0 T 440 L 51 L to 1 s 5.5x 222x -38L
    2.4 20V 440 L 42 L to 1 s 5.5x 181x -38L
    2.4 i 20V 440 L 47 L to 1 s 5.5x 181x -38L
    2.4 TDi 440 L 47 L to 1 s 5.5x 183x -38L
    2.9 24V 440 L 56 L to 1 s 5.5x 151x -38L
    2.5 i 20V 440 L 64 L to 1 s 5.5x 175x -38L
    2.4 i T 460 L 61 L to 1 s 5.8x 189x -18L
    2.5 TDI 440 L 42 L to 1 s 6.3x 179x -38L
    2.8 24V T6 440 L 65 L to 1 s 5.5x 158x -38L
    2.9 i 24V 460 L 55 L to 1 s 5.8x 157x -18L
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.0 20V Turbo
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.4 20V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 20V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.4 TDi
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.9 24V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 151x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.4 i T
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.8 24V T6
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 158x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.9 i 24V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 157x
    Difference with world average -18L