Volvo V40 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Volvo V40 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 296 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 59.2 L
    • Max trunk load: 92 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T2 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T2 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D2 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.46 L/km-h (0.91 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T4 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T2 : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T2 : 57.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D2 : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 83.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T3 : 54x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T4 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 54.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T3 : 56.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T2 236 L 24 L to 1 s 3.8x 120x -242L
    1.5 T2 324 L 35 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    2.0 D3 236 L 29 L to 1 s 3.8x 120x -242L
    2.0 D2 236 L 23 L to 1 s 3.8x 120x -242L
    2.0 D4 335 L 49 L to 1 s 8.4x 170x -143L
    2.0 T3 324 L 38 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 T4 324 L 49 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 T5 324 L 54 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    1.5 T3 324 L 41 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T2
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 120x
    Difference with world average -242L
    Vehicle 1.5 T2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 120x
    Difference with world average -242L
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 120x
    Difference with world average -242L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 324 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 64.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 91 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T4 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T3 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 75.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T3 : 57.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D2 : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T4 : 50.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 81x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 50.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T3 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 D4 324 L 46 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    1.5 T3 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    2.0 D2 324 L 32 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 T4 324 L 46 L to 1 s 5.7x 165x -154L
    2.0 D3 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 T5 324 L 56 L to 1 s 5.7x 165x -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 330 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 66 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T5 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T5 : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4 : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 2.5 T5 : 1.43 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
  • 1.6 D2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 1.68 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T5 : 41.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T3 : 57.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D2 : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T3 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 60.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 T5 : 40.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 D2 : 79x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 64.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 64.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T5 335 L 49 L to 1 s 5.9x 169x -143L
    1.5 T3 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    2.0 D2 324 L 32 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 T3 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    1.6 T4 335 L 46 L to 1 s 5.4x 210x -143L
    2.5 T5 335 L 55 L to 1 s 5.9x 134x -143L
    1.6 D2 324 L 28 L to 1 s 6.2x 208x -154L
    2.0 D3 335 L 38 L to 1 s 5.6x 169x -143L
    2.0 D4 335 L 42 L to 1 s 5.6x 169x -143L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 134x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 208x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average -143L

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 352 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 70.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 85 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D2 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.5 T3 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T3 : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5 T5 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T2 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D2 : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 1.5 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.42 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.25 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T3 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4 : 1.44 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
  • 2.5 T5 : 1.3 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T2 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D2 : 104.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T2 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T3 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 T3 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 54.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 D2 : 83.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 93.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 110.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T3 : 55.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 50.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 T5 : 41x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T2 : 61.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T2 324 L 35 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    2.0 D2 335 L 33 L to 1 s 8.4x 170x -143L
    1.5 T2 324 L 35 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    2.0 T3 324 L 41 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    1.5 T3 324 L 41 L to 1 s 5.2x 216x -154L
    2.0 T5 324 L 54 L to 1 s 5.2x 165x -154L
    1.6 D2 335 L 29 L to 1 s 6.4x 215x -143L
    2.0 D3 496 L 56 L to 1 s 8.3x 250x +18L
    2.0 D4 496 L 60 L to 1 s 8.3x 250x +18L
    1.6 T3 324 L 39 L to 1 s 5.2x 203x -154L
    1.6 T4 324 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 203x -154L
    2.5 T5 324 L 56 L to 1 s 5.2x 130x -154L
    1.6 T2 324 L 34 L to 1 s 5.2x 203x -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 D2
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 1.5 T2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.5 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 215x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 496 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +18L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 496 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +18L
    Vehicle 1.6 T3
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 2.5 T5
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -154L
    Vehicle 1.6 T2
    Trunk space 324 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -154L

    Quick notes on Volvo V40 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 449 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 89.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 78 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 16V : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 16V : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)
  • 1.8 GDI : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T4 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 5.2 L/hp (7.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 16V : 2.29 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 1.8 16V : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T : 2.14 L/km-h (1.33 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 1.8 GDI : 2.07 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T4 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 2.55 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 16V : 51x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 D : 65.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T4 : 55.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 16V 470 L 51 L to 1 s 7.8x 241x -8L
    1.8 16V 413 L 41 L to 1 s 6.9x 239x -65L
    2.0 T 470 L 58 L to 1 s 7.8x 241x -8L
    1.6 16V 470 L 41 L to 1 s 7.8x 296x -8L
    1.8 GDI 413 L 41 L to 1 s 6.9x 225x -65L
    1.9 D 413 L 41 L to 1 s 6.9x 221x -65L
    2.0 T4 471 L 68 L to 1 s 7.9x 242x -7L
    1.9 TD 471 L 38 L to 1 s 7.9x 252x -7L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 470 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -8L
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Trunk space 413 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 239x
    Difference with world average -65L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 470 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -8L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 470 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 296x
    Difference with world average -8L
    Vehicle 1.8 GDI
    Trunk space 413 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 225x
    Difference with world average -65L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 413 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -65L
    Vehicle 2.0 T4
    Trunk space 471 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average -7L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 471 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average -7L