Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 417 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 261x | -61L |
2.4i | 417 L | 48 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 171x | -61L |
1.8 F | 417 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 232x | -61L |
2.4 | 417 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 171x | -61L |
2.0 F | 417 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 209x | -61L |
2.5 T5 | 417 L | 60 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 165x | -61L |
2.5 T5 AVVD | 417 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 165x | -61L |
2.0 D | 417 L | 46 L to 1 s | 8x | 209x | -61L |
1.6 D DRIVe | 417 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8x | 267x | -61L |
2.4 D5 | 417 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7x | 174x | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.8 F |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.0 F |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.5 T5 AVVD |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.6 D DRIVe |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.4 D5 |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 20V T5 | 417 L | 63 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 165x | -61L |
2.4 20V | 417 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 171x | -61L |
2.4 i 20V | 417 L | 48 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 171x | -61L |
1.6 i 16V | 417 L | 37 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 261x | -61L |
1.8 i 16V | 417 L | 40 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 232x | -61L |
1.6 D | 417 L | 36 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 267x | -61L |
2.0 D | 417 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 209x | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.5 20V T5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.4 20V |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 20V |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 171x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 1.6 D |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | -61L |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -61L |