Volvo V70 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Volvo V70 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 555 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 111 L
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 T4 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 D2 : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D4 : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4F : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 T4 : 2.58 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • 1.6 D2 : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.85 L/km-h (1.77 L/mph)
  • 3.0 T6 : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D4 : 2.71 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4F : 2.58 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 T4 : 77.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 D2 : 123.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 86.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 108.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 54.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 123.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D4 : 89.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 89.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4F : 77.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 T4 555 L 59 L to 1 s 7.9x 348x +77L
    1.6 D2 555 L 49 L to 1 s 7.9x 356x +77L
    2.0 T5 555 L 87 L to 1 s 7.9x 282x +77L
    2.0 D3 555 L 55 L to 1 s 7.9x 280x +77L
    3.0 T6 555 L 88 L to 1 s 7.9x 188x +77L
    2.0 D4 555 L 68 L to 1 s 7.9x 282x +77L
    2.4 D4 555 L 54 L to 1 s 7.9x 231x +77L
    2.4 D5 555 L 73 L to 1 s 7.9x 231x +77L
    1.6 T4F 555 L 59 L to 1 s 7.9x 348x +77L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 1.6 D2
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 356x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 282x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 280x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 188x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 282x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 2.4 D4
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average +77L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4F
    Trunk space 555 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +77L

    Quick notes on Volvo V70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 575 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 115 L
      • Max trunk load: 98 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T : 2.8 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.4d : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0F : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4 : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 3.2 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5FT : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 T4F : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 DRIVe : 5.3 L/hp (7.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4D : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.5 T : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0D : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 3.0i T6 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 3.2i : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 2.4d : 2.61 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • 2.0F : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4 : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • 3.2 : 2.45 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.5FT : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 1.6 T4F : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 1.6 DRIVe : 3.03 L/km-h (1.88 L/mph)
  • 2.4D : 2.8 L/km-h (1.74 L/mph)
  • 2.5 T : 2.61 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D3 : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.0D : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • 3.0 T6 : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)
  • 3.0i T6 : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • 3.2i : 2.45 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 T : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4d : 79.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0F : 66.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4 : 74.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 89.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 66.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 : 62.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D : 95.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5FT : 65.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 T4F : 76.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 DRIVe : 127.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4D : 76.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 T : 56.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 104.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0D : 97.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 56.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0i T6 : 50.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2i : 54.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T 575 L 73 L to 1 s 8.2x 288x +97L
    2.4d 575 L 67 L to 1 s 8.2x 239x +97L
    2.0F 575 L 54 L to 1 s 8.2x 288x +97L
    1.6 T4 575 L 61 L to 1 s 8.2x 361x +97L
    2.4 D5 575 L 74 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.0 575 L 54 L to 1 s 8.2x 288x +97L
    3.2 575 L 72 L to 1 s 8.2x 180x +97L
    2.4 D 575 L 64 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.5FT 575 L 79 L to 1 s 8.2x 228x +97L
    1.6 T4F 575 L 61 L to 1 s 8.2x 360x +97L
    1.6 DRIVe 575 L 47 L to 1 s 8.2x 369x +97L
    2.4D 575 L 58 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.5 T 575 L 71 L to 1 s 8.2x 228x +97L
    2.0 T5 575 L 79 L to 1 s 8.2x 288x +97L
    2.0 D3 575 L 61 L to 1 s 8.2x 290x +97L
    2.0D 575 L 55 L to 1 s 8.2x 288x +97L
    3.0 T6 575 L 87 L to 1 s 8.2x 195x +97L
    3.0i T6 575 L 85 L to 1 s 8.2x 195x +97L
    3.2i 575 L 72 L to 1 s 8.2x 180x +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4d
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 239x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0F
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 361x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.2
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.5FT
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 1.6 T4F
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 360x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 1.6 DRIVe
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 369x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4D
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.5 T
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 71 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 290x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0D
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.0i T6
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 85 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.2i
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +97L

    Quick notes on Volvo V70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 485 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 97 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4i 20V T5 : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4i 20V T5 : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4i 20V T5 485 L 75 L to 1 s 6.9x 202x +7L
    2.4 D5 485 L 57 L to 1 s 6.9x 202x +7L
    Vehicle 2.4i 20V T5
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 202x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 202x
    Difference with world average +7L

    Quick notes on Volvo V70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 492 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 98.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 95 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.4 : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 2.5i V20 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 2.5i 20V : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • T5 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D : 3 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 Bi-Fuel : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 2.5 TDI : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 T : 2.31 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.4 : 2.37 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.5i V20 : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T : 2.62 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)
  • 2.5i 20V : 2.11 L/km-h (1.31 L/mph)
  • T5 : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D : 2.31 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.4 Bi-Fuel : 2.37 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.5 TDI : 2.43 L/km-h (1.51 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 T : 51.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T : 56.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • T5 : 51.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D : 72.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 T 485 L 65 L to 1 s 6.9x 199x +7L
    2.4 485 L 49 L to 1 s 6.9x 199x +7L
    2.5i V20 485 L 87 L to 1 s 6.9x 192x +7L
    2.0 T 550 L 64 L to 1 s 7.9x 277x +72L
    2.5i 20V 485 L 69 L to 1 s 6.9x 192x +7L
    T5 485 L 72 L to 1 s 6.9x 209x +7L
    2.4 D 485 L 52 L to 1 s 6.9x 202x +7L
    2.4 Bi-Fuel 485 L 49 L to 1 s 6.9x 199x +7L
    2.5 TDI 485 L 48 L to 1 s 6.9x 197x +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 T
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.4
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.5i V20
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 2.5i 20V
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle T5
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 209x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 D
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 202x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 Bi-Fuel
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average +7L

    Quick notes on Volvo V70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 420 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 84 L
      • Max trunk load: 92 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5 TDI : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 2.3 Turbo : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 2.4i 20V : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.3 20V T-5 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.5 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 20V Turbo : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5 20V Turbo : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 20V : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.3 T : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5 TDI : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 2.3 Turbo : 1.68 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 2.4i 20V : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 2.3 20V T-5 : 1.87 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.5 : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.0 20V Turbo : 1.75 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 2.5 20V Turbo : 1.87 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.0 20V : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.3 T : 1.68 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.5 TDI : 64.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 Turbo : 45.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5 TDI 420 L 43 L to 1 s 6x 171x -58L
    2.3 Turbo 420 L 63 L to 1 s 6x 181x -58L
    2.4i 20V 420 L 48 L to 1 s 6x 172x -58L
    2.3 20V T-5 420 L 55 L to 1 s 6x 181x -58L
    2.5 420 L 42 L to 1 s 6x 172x -58L
    2.0 420 L 37 L to 1 s 6x 212x -58L
    2.0 20V Turbo 420 L 57 L to 1 s 6x 212x -58L
    2.5 20V Turbo 420 L 55 L to 1 s 6x 172x -58L
    2.0 20V 420 L 47 L to 1 s 6x 212x -58L
    2.3 T 420 L 65 L to 1 s 6x 181x -58L
    Vehicle 2.5 TDI
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 171x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.3 Turbo
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.4i 20V
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 172x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.3 20V T-5
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.5
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 172x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.0 20V Turbo
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.5 20V Turbo
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 172x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.0 20V
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -58L