cat_logo
HomeVolvo

Xc70

Volvo XC70 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Volvo XC70 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 575 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 115 L
    • Max trunk load: 116 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 T5 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D4 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D4 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 T5 : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.8 L/km-h (1.74 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D4 : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D4 : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T5 : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 3.0 T6 : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 T5 : 66.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 89.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D4 : 89.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D4 : 117.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T5 : 85.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 54.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 T5 575 L 86 L to 1 s 8.2x 230x +97L
    2.4 D5 575 L 73 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.4 D4 575 L 64 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.0 D4 575 L 68 L to 1 s 8.2x 292x +97L
    2.0 T5 575 L 88 L to 1 s 8.2x 292x +97L
    3.0 T6 575 L 87 L to 1 s 8.2x 195x +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 T5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 86 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 230x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D4
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 D4
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 T5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average +97L

    Quick notes on Volvo XC70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 575 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 115 L
      • Max trunk load: 107 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.2 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4d : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4D : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D DRIVe : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 3.0 T6 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Drive : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D3 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D3 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.2 : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.4d : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Drive : 2.8 L/km-h (1.74 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.2 : 56.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4d : 78.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4D : 81x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D DRIVe : 95.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D5 : 102.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 T6 : 54.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Drive : 104.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D3 : 89.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 D3 : 102.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.2 575 L 67 L to 1 s 8.2x 180x +97L
    2.4d 575 L 65 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.4D 575 L 59 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.4 D DRIVe 575 L 63 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    2.4 D5 575 L 76 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    3.0 T6 575 L 82 L to 1 s 8.2x 195x +97L
    2.0 Drive 575 L 59 L to 1 s 8.2x 290x +97L
    2.0 D3 575 L 59 L to 1 s 8.2x 290x +97L
    2.4 D3 575 L 58 L to 1 s 8.2x 240x +97L
    Vehicle 3.2
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4d
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4D
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D DRIVe
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 3.0 T6
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 195x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 Drive
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 290x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.0 D3
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 290x
    Difference with world average +97L
    Vehicle 2.4 D3
    Trunk space 575 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +97L

    Quick notes on Volvo XC70 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 485 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 97 L
      • Max trunk load: 101 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.5 T : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.4 D5 : 3 L/hp (4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 T : 2.31 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.5 T : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.4 D5 : 2.49 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 T 485 L 59 L to 1 s 7.1x 199x +7L
    2.5 T 485 L 63 L to 1 s 7.1x 192x +7L
    2.4 D5 485 L 44 L to 1 s 7.1x 202x +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 T
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.5 T
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle 2.4 D5
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 202x
    Difference with world average +7L